✨ Save up to 4 weeks on your antibody development with our new RocketAbs immunization platform!✨
Big high diversity libraries for diagnostics
Generate the most selective and specific antibodies using one of our high-diversity naïve libraries of camelid VHH and rabbit monoclonal antibodies
You get the full ownership of the antibody sequence generated!
Always receive AT LEAST 3 unique binders against your antigen!
From antigen to antibody in as little as 7 weeks
scFv, Fab, and VHH formats available
The variety of our libraries allows us to propose a wide range of formats suitable for diagnostic applications
Minimize animal use in your antibody discovery projects by choosing our premium naïve libraries built for the highest possible quality and diversity
Antibodies for diagnostic applications are prized for their specificity and ability to target cryptic antigens. For these reasons, rabbit antibodies and camelid-derived nanobodies present considerable advantages in comparison to their mouse monoclonal counterparts.
Rabbit monoclonal antibodies, for instance, have naturally higher antigen-binding affinities and specificities, making them ideal to detect low abundance markers in complex samples, a vital property for robust early diagnostic tools. Furthermore, rabbit monoclonal antibodies are particularly useful when researchers and clinicians need to distinguish between different isoforms of the same disease marker (i.e. post-translational modifications, single-point mutations, etc.), a vital property of differential diagnostic tools for establishing disease severity and predict clinical outcomes as early as possible.
VHH single domain antibodies can be considered complementary to rabbit monoclonal antibodies for diagnostic applications. These small molecules distinguish themselves from their monoclonal counterparts in terms of size (15 kDa opposed to 150 kDa in monoclonal antibodies) and complexity (no glycans attached to their structures). These properties endow them with the ability to diffuse efficiently across tissues making them desirable for a plethora of different diagnostic techniques including advanced imaging.
Choosing between naïve and immune libraries for phage display can be especially challenging. For this reason, we believe it should be done on a case-by-case basis, following a detailed analysis that considers the nature of the antigen and the intended format of the diagnostic application.
In general terms, naïve antibody libraries are less limited than their immune counterparts, as such, a single high-quality naïve library can be used to isolate binders against multiple antigens or epitopes, while an immune library is biased towards a specific antigen and serves only to isolate antibodies specific to a single antigen or pathogen.
Moreover, naïve libraries allow the generation of high-quality antibodies with moderate to high affinity in as little time as possible (about 7 weeks). This is particularly desirable for the development of fast response diagnostic platforms and extensive diagnostic screening applications based on lateral flow assays (LFA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and clinical imaging.
Immune libraries as the result of antigen-challenged antibody repertoires and are sparsely used to achieve higher affinities in challenging and complex projects.
Fast and differential diagnostic platforms require highly selective (low cross-reactive) antibodies to detect low-abundance markers and distinguish between different isoforms. ELISA is one of the most popular formats during the early stages of diagnostic and wide-range population screening studies. ELISA tests are particularly flexible and can be designed to either target specific antibodies or antigens via several formats:
The use of antibody pairs is greatly beneficial when aiming to detect low abundance markers with high accuracy. However, developing robust antibody pairs can be challenging due to the need to exert precise control over which epitopes are recognized by both antibodies. Phage display technologies are well-fitted to solve this challenge since biopanning can be performed efficiently and quickly with different peptides (epitopes) ensuring these antibodies have no epitope cross-reactivity and can be used in the same custom assay.
Another particularly useful technique for fast, early, and differential diagnostics is flow cytometry. Typically employing fluorescence labeled antibodies, this technique can be used in multiplexing conditions to detect different markers in the same sample and estimate their relative abundances. These assays are also challenging to develop due to the need to ensure flow cytometry antibodies don’t bind off-target. For this reason, it is advisable to develop a single antibody panel (a mixture of antibodies binding to different antigens) in a single workflow and the flexibility of phage display is well adapted to tackle that challenge.
Antibodies have become extremely important tools for current medical diagnostic technologies. Moreover, researchers are increasingly interested in designing antibodies able to detect even the slightest changes in a patient’s proteome for accurate early and differential diagnoses of diseases that are hard to detect.
For this reason, diagnostic antibodies should possess distinctive properties including:
Got a question or need a quote? Message us and we'll get back to you 48 hours or less.
Your cart is currently empty.