Cart (0 Items)
Your cart is currently empty.
View ProductsIt looks like you are visiting from outside the EU. Switch to the US version to see local pricing in USD and local shipping.
Switch to US ($)
Protein production
Mammalian systems are considered one of the best for protein expression due to their enhanced protein folding, ultra-high yields, and ability to perform human-like glycosylation, which is vital for therapeutic proteins such as antibodies. A wealth of knowledge is currently available regarding the genetic background, promoters, transfection reagents, and protein purification methods used for mammalian systems. Additionally, a wide range of cell lines, growth media, and expression vectors are also commercially available, making it easy to optimize expression in these systems by allowing researchers to screen several constructs in parallel for optimal results.
Because mammalian cells are unable to replicate plasmids independently, two different methodologies were developed for these systems – stable and transient. Stable expression requires the total integration of the gene of interest into the host’s genome via recombination or transposon-mediated gene transfer. Due to the time-consuming nature of this methodology, stable cell line generation is typically reserved for large-scale production. In contrast, transient expression harnesses the superior features of mammalian systems while considerably reducing lead times. These properties make them highly desirable for research and analytical applications, and drug and protein variant screening purposes.
The typical steps required for protein expression in transient mammalian systems include:
Typical mammalian cell lines used for recombinant protein production include:
More than 70% of all biopharmaceuticals are currently produced in CHO cell lines. These genes are easy to handle, amenable to high-density cultures, and safer than HEK which, due to its human origin, may harbor and disseminate human pathogens.
Protein expression in insect cells is comparable in terms of quality and yield to mammalian systems. Insect cells are capable of performing highly efficient protein folding, post-translational modifications, and protein trafficking, all in shorter lead times than mammalian systems. However, glycosylation pathways in insects differ significantly from higher eukaryotes, making them less optimal for the production of full-length therapeutic antibodies.
This expression system is commonly used when specific proteins fail to be expressed in bacterial and yeast systems. Currently, the most popular form of insect cell expression is mediated by baculoviruses, arthropod-specific viruses. Interestingly, these viruses can be adapted to propagation in Escherichia coli. These hybrid vectors are named bacmids and represent a highly cost-effective solution for recombinant protein expression.
The typical steps required for protein expression in insect/baculovirus systems include:
Typical insect cell lines used for recombinant protein production include:
Cell lines S2 and S2R+ from Drosophila melanogaster of the order Diptera (flies).
Discover our insect/baculovirus protein expression services
Yeast cells are the simplest eukaryotic protein production systems. They are uniquely poised between the enhanced protein folding and modification capacities of mammalian systems and the simplicity and flexibility of bacterial systems. Although they are unable to perform human-like glycosylation required for some pharmaceutical proteins such as antibodies, yeast systems are prized for their fast growth, ease of genetic manipulation, scalable fermentation, safe pathogen-free production, and high production yields.
An attractive advantage of yeast vectors is their ability to replicate autonomously in host cells (episomal vectors). This feature considerably shortens the development timeline because it forgoes the need to stably integrate the foreign genes into the host’s genome. Episomal vectors provide high copy numbers and high protein yields; however, they are easily lost in the absence of selection. Transformation of yeast systems is also simplified because yeast vectors are easily produced in Escherichia coli (shuttle vectors) before being propagated in the final host.
The typical steps required for protein expression in yeast include:
Typical yeast strains used for recombinant protein production include:
P. pastoris has been gaining ground over more conventional S. cerevisiae systems for protein expression due to its ability to achieve higher cell densities and superior protein yields.
Discover our yeast protein expression services
Bacteria are one of the most widely used expression systems due to their inexpensive requirements, fast growth, ease of genetic manipulation, straightforward scale-up process, and high protein yields. From a practical point of view, bacteria serve as excellent starting points for many functional studies and research applications. Plus, many biopharmaceuticals are currently produced in bacteria such as Escherichia coli.
However, this expression system remains limited in terms of post-translational modifications and protein folding, making it impractical for the production of complex proteins such as IgG-like antibodies (monoclonal or bispecific). Bacterial systems also tend to produce proteins intracellularly requiring harsh extraction and purification methods. Additionally, some proteins may be produced as insoluble inclusion bodies, requiring the use of denaturants and subsequent protein-refolding processes, substantially reducing purity and yields.
The typical steps required for protein expression in bacteria are the following:
Typical bacterial strains used for recombinant protein expression:
Substantially more information, plasmids, and strains are available for protein expression in E. coli. The use of B. subtilis is limited due to the lack of standardized expression vectors and systems based on this species. Although this gram-positive bacterium presents some advantages over E. coli such as the ability to secrete proteins to the growth medium, much work remains to be done before this system reaches commercial maturity.
Discover our protein expression services in E. coli and B. subtilis
Bacteria, yeast, insect cells, and mammalian cells are all widely used systems for recombinant protein production. Each system has its unique advantages and limitations:
| ADVANTAGES | LIMITATIONS | |
|---|---|---|
| Mammalian systems | · Enhanced protein folding
· Human-like glycosylation · Efficient protein secretion – cost-effective purification · High batch-to-batch consistency · High purity · High production yields meeting important quality standards · Adapted to most types of proteins · Fast production possible (transient) |
· Longer lead times (stable)
· Time-consuming and laborious (stable) · Cell lines are harder to engineer due to the complexity of their genomes · Need for incubators with CO2 gassing to maintain suitable pH values · Risk of viral infections or contamination with mycoplasma |
| Insect systems | · Good production yields
· Adequate protein folding · Ability to carry out complex post-translational modifications – comparable to mammalian systems · Production is easily scaled up |
· Time-consuming and laborious process due to the need to produce baculovirus (bacmid) for transduction
· Risk of cell lysis upon infection – may reduce protein purity and quality |
| Yeast systems | · Efficient protein secretion – easier and cost-effective purification
· Ease of genetic manipulation · Short turnaround times · Ability to carry out some post-translational modifications · No stable integration required for large-scale production · Production is easily scaled up |
· Moderate risk of plasmid loss even in selective conditions
· Inability to perform human-like glycosylation without extensive engineering · Yeast cells may be difficult to lyse resulting in protein denaturation during extraction and the need for in vitro refolding |
| Bacterial systems | · Extremely short turnaround times
· Advantageous for antibody fragment (scFv, Fab, VHH) and small protein production · Ease of genetic manipulation · No stable integration required for large-scale production · Production is easily scaled up · Extremely cost-effective · Inexpensive medium and growth conditions required |
· No post-translational modifications
· Intracellular production – harsher purification methods required · Risks of forming inclusion bodies leading to low yields · Contamination with endotoxins (E. coli) requiring additional purification steps when proteins are meant for biopharmaceutical or cell culture use |
Despite the different advantages and limitations of these systems, it is important to bear in mind that choosing an expression depends, first and foremost of:
The intended application of the recombinant protein – even complex proteins such as IgG-like antibodies may be produced in simpler with high turnover systems. In these proteins, glycans are restricted to the Fc fragment (crystallizable fragment) and modulate the effector functions of these biomolecules. However, even devoid of glycans, antibodies can bind to target antigens. For this reason, antibodies for research (functional studies, medical, or basic research) and in vitro diagnostics can be produced in bacteria or yeast, because effector functions are non-essential for these applications. In contrast, antibodies intended for therapeutic use are mostly produced in mammalian systems able to perform human-like glycosylation essential to modulate the immune response.
Get the most out of your transient expression experiments
with XtenCHO. Ultra-high yields, minimized hands-on time,
and longer transient expression periods.
A typical expression vector used in mammalian systems may include the following elements:
Promoters modulate the transcription process by controlling the binding of the RNA polymerase and associated factors to the DNA chain. This element dictates the timing and amount of protein that will be produced by a specific recombinant system. These elements are generally classified as constitutive, inducible, or repressible.
The first type of promoters is always active independently of the circumstances. In contrast, inducible promoters are only activated by specific signals, acting like an ON switch. Repressible promoters have found limited applicability in recombinant protein production. However, they are substantially used in research. In their basal state, these promoters are always active, but they can be repressed by specific signals. Thus, these promoters act as OFF switches.
In the table below, you can find a list of the most commonly used promoters in both eukaryotic and prokaryotic recombinant expression systems:
| Promoter | Origin | Promoter type | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EURAKYOTIC | CMV | Human cytomegalovirus | Constitutive |
| EF1A | Human elongation factor alpha | Constitutive | |
| TEF1 | Yeast transcription elongation factor (analogous to EF1a) | Constitutive | |
| SV40 | Simian vacuolation virus 40 | Constitutive | |
| UBC | Human ubiquitin C gene | Constitutive | |
| PGK | Human or mouse phosphoglycerate kinase gene | Constitutive | |
| CAG | Synthetic promoter constructed from CMV, chicken beta-actin gene, and rabbit beta-globin gene | Constitutive | |
| Ac5 | Drosophila Actin 5c gene | Constitutive | |
| OpIE 1 & 2 | Orgyia pseudotsugata multicapsid nuclear polyhedrovirus | Constitutive | |
| PH | Baculovirus promoter (polyhedrin) | Constitutive | |
| P10 | Baculovirus promoter | Constitutive | |
| GAP | Pichia pastoris glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene | Constitutive | |
| TET | E. coli Tn10-specified tetracycline-resistance operon | Inducible (tetracycline) | |
| GAL4/UAS | Yeast transcriptional activator GAL4 and upstream activation sequence UAS | Inducible (heat shock) | |
| cTA | p-cmt and p-cym operon in Pseudomonas putida | Inducible (cumate) | |
| MT | Drosophila metallothionein promoter | Inducible (copper) | |
| AOX1 | Pichia pastoris alcohol oxidase gene AOX1 | Inducible (methanol) | |
| GAL1 | Saccharomyces cerevisiae galactokinase gene GAL1 | Inducible (galactose) | |
| ADH1 | Yeast promoter for alcohol dehydrogenase I | Repressible (ethanol) | |
| PROKARYOTIC | T7 | T7 bacteriophage promoter | Constitutive* |
| T7lac | T7 bacteriophage promoter + lac operators | Constitutive* | |
| Sp6 | Sp6 bacteriophage promoter | Constitutive* | |
| T3 | T3 bacteriophage promoter | Constitutive* | |
| lac | Promoter from the lactose operon | Inducible (IPTG) | |
| Ptac | Hybrid synthetic promoter of lac and trp | Inducible (IPTG) | |
| pL | Promoter from bacteriophage lambda | Inducible (temperature) | |
| araBAD | Promoter of the arabinose metabolic operon | Inducible (arabinose)
Repressible (glucose) |
|
| trp | Promoter of E. coli tryptophan operon | Repressible (tryptophan) |
*Require T7, Sp6, or T3 RNA polymerase, respectively. Highlighted in grey are the most commonly used promoters.
Inducible promoters are the standard among prokaryotic expression systems. In contrast, constitutive promoters are dominant among mammalian and other eukaryotic systems. They can deliver high-level expression without the need to use additional signals (i.e., chemicals, heat, etc.), which are often toxic, expensive, or known to affect the integrity of the mammalian cell. This uncontrolled expression becomes disadvantageous only when expressing toxic proteins for long periods of time. In these specific circumstances, inducible or repressible promoters can be used to minimize the risks of early cell death and maintain cell viability for as long as possible.
Fusion tags can be short peptide sequences or large proteins. They are recurrently used to improve purification (affinity or epitope tags), solubility (solubility tags), or simply as a means to monitor or visualize protein expression (fluorescent tags). Tags can be removed by chemical or enzymatic methods. However, this is only done if the activity or structure of the recombinant protein are severely affected. In fact, many tags were found to improve stability during storage and extend the shelf-life of recombinant proteins.
Large tags are more commonly used to improve solubility, while shorter tags are more commonly used to mediate protein purification processes. In comparison, affinity tags are also larger than epitope tags. The first ones are fused to the protein of interest, allowing the purification via affinity chromatography. While epitope tags are typically engineered into the protein of interest, allowing antibody-mediated purification. Both affinity and antibody-mediated purification processes can be carried out by immobilizing antibodies or other compounds on resins (affinity purification) or on magnetic beads (magnetic-based purification). The former is suitable for large volumes, while the latter is more suitable for small-scale purification.
| Tag name | Type | Sequence or Size | Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hemagglutinin (HA) | Epitope | YPYDVPDYA (9) | Anti-HA antibody |
| c-myc | Epitope | EQKLISEEDL (10) | Anti-Myc antibody |
| V5 | Epitope | GKPIPNPLLGLDST (14) | Anti-V5 antibody |
| FLAGTM | Epitope | DYKDDDDK (8) | Anti-FLAG antibody |
| Poly-His | Affinity | nH (n=2-12, usually 6) | Metal ions |
| Poly-Arg | Affinity | nR (n=5-6, usually 5) | Cation exchange resin |
| Strep-tag | Affinity | WRHPQFGG (8) | Streptavidin |
| Strep-tag II | Affinity | WSHPQFEK (8) | StrepTactin |
| Twin-Strep-tag | Affinity | 3 kDa | StrepTactin |
| Biotin acceptor protein (BAP) | Affinity | GLNDIFEAQKIEWHE (15) | Avidin |
| Calmodulin-binding protein (CBP) | Affinity | 3 kDa | Calmodulin |
| Chitin-binding tag | Affinity | 6 kDa | Chitin |
| Maltose-binding (MBP) tag | Solubility | 43 kDa | Transversely-linked amylose |
| Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) tag | Solubility | 27 kDa | Glutathione |
| SUMO tag (small ubiquitin-like modifier) | Solubility | 12 kDa | Accommodates any type of affinity tags such as 6xHis |
| NusA tag | Solubility | 55 kDa | Accommodates any type of affinity tags such as 6xHis |
| TrxA | Solubility | 24 kDa | Accommodates any type of affinity tags such as 6xHis |
| Fh8 | Solubility | 8 kDa | Accommodates any type of affinity tags such as 6xHis |
| Halo | Solubility | 33 kDa | Chloroalkanes |
| Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) | Fluorescence | 27 kDa | Anti-GFP antibody or fusion with an affinity tag |
| Red Fluorescent Protein (RFP) | Fluorescence | 26 kDa | Anti-RFP antibody or fusion with an affinity tag |
| mCherry | Fluorescence | 28 kDa | Anti-mCherry antibody |
Tag names shown in bold represent the most commonly used fusion tags.
Of all tags mentioned, it is worth mentioning that fluorescent tags are extremely useful when working with transient mammalian systems. Because transient systems tend to lose their expression vectors with each cell division cycle, it is not recommended to select and isolate positive clones before protein production. In these systems, high transfection efficiencies directly correlate with high protein titers. For this reason, researchers use fluorescent tags to measure and optimize transfection efficiency.
Affinity and epitope tags are recurrently used on all expression systems. Alternatively, recombinant antibodies can be purified using the following methods:
Interestingly, these purification methods are typically reserved for small and medium-scale antibody production because they can become expensive at the large-scale. To reduce purification costs at this scale, antibodies can also be associated with a number of different affinity or epitope tags.
Positive selection is typically carried out via metabolic or antibiotic selectable markers. Metabolic selection is generally used in mammalian systems while antibiotic-mediated selection is the standard method for bacterial cell selection.
| Type | Name | Gene | Selection |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metabolic selection (eukaryotic) | DHFR system | Dihydrofolate reductase gene (dhfr) | Used with DHFR- cell lines or cells pre-treated with methotrexate (MTX), a powerful DHFR inhibitor. Selection is made in media devoid of glycine, hypoxanthine, and thymidine. |
| GS system | Glutamine synthetase gene (glul) | Used with GS- cell lines or cells pre-treated with methionine sulfoximine (MSX), a GS inhibitor. Selection is made in the presence of MSX and glutamine – only degraded by GS+ cells. | |
| Antibiotic (eukaryotic) | Blasticidin | Blasticidin-S deaminase gene (bsd) | Protein synthesis inhibition by binding to the ribosome |
| Hygromycin B | Hygromycin B phosphotransferase gene (hygB) | Protein synthesis inhibition by binding to the ribosome | |
| G418/Geneticin | Neomycin-resistance gene (neo) | Protein synthesis inhibition by interfering with initiation and elongation | |
| Puromycin | Puromycin N-acetyltransferase (pac) | Protein synthesis inhibition by blocking the entrance of aminoacyl-tRNA | |
| ZeocinTM | ZeocinTM resistance gene (Sh ble) | Causes cell death by intercalating with DNA and cleaving it via reactive radicals | |
| Antibiotic (prokaryotic) | Ampicilin | Beta-lactamase (amp) | Inhibition of the cell wall synthesis |
| Chloramphenicol | Chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (cat) | Protein synthesis inhibition by binding to the bacterial 50S ribosomal subunit | |
| Kanamycin | Neomycin phosphotransferase (kan) | Protein synthesis inhibition by interfering with initiation and elongation | |
| Tetracycline | Tetracycline resistance protein (tetA) | Protein synthesis inhibition by binding the bacterial 30S ribosomal subunit |
Transformation, transduction, and transfection are used to describe the introduction of foreign DNA or RNA into eukaryotic or prokaryotic cells. Transformation and transduction occur naturally and are collectively named horizontal gene transfer (HGT) processes. In contrast, transfection is a man-made protocol used to insert genes into eukaryotic cells (mainly mammalian).
Transformation is the process through which bacteria assimilate genetic material from their surrounding environment. It occurs spontaneously and frequently in nature, often promoted by the presence of specific substances. In the lab, researchers harness the process of natural transformation by:
Transduction occurs when foreign genetic material is introduced into prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells via a virus or viral vector. Viruses interact with cells via specific membrane-bound receptors. As a result, they undergo important structural changes leading to the injection of their genomes (DNA or RNA) into the cytoplasm of their host.
Within the cell, the genetic machinery hijacks the cellular processes to produce multiple copies of the virus. Alternatively, the extrachromosomal DNA or RNA is integrate the host’s genome through a process of homologous or site-directed recombination. Transduction can be used in all different expression systems. However, it is more commonly applied to insect systems.
Mammalian cells are unable to uptake naked plasmid DNA, they can only be modified via transduction or transfection. Transduction is generally considered an expensive and time-consuming process, especially when it comes to mammalian systems. The reason stems from the need to produce the viral vectors in other mammalian cells. For this reason, protein expression in these systems is conventionally carried out via transfection using chemical or physical methods.
Chemical methods remain the most popular and widely used approach of the two due to the ease, low cost, and wide variety of commercial transfection reagents. The most common transfection methods used in mammalian systems include:
Microinjection: as the name indicates, microinjection refers to the process of injecting foreign DNA or RNA into the cytoplasm of a cell via a very thin needle. Despite the high degree of control and efficiency achieved via microinjection, it has a very low throughput. For this reason, it is mostly reserved for single-cell applications.
Get the most out of your transient expression experiments
with XtenCHO. Ultra-high yields, minimized hands-on time,
and longer transient expression periods.